Unlike many conferences, Sirens does not assemble its own programming. Instead, we invite our attendees—all of our attendees, regardless of vocation, level of experience, or years at Sirens—to propose the papers, lectures, panels, roundtable discussions, workshops, and afternoon classes that make up our programming. After all, everyone at Sirens has something to say!
To propose programming, Sirens attendees prepare abstracts: most often, summaries of the topic, including research, arguments, and conclusions, but in some cases, lesson plans or detailed discussion questions. Our independent vetting board then reviews those proposals and selects those to be included in the Sirens programming schedule. If your proposal is selected, you’ll present your topic at Sirens.
We hope you’ll remember that Sirens is deliberately interdisciplinary in its approach. At Sirens, readers present alongside librarians, educators and booksellers collaborate on course curriculum, and authors learn from scholars. We think that our method of programming selection highlights the importance of this interdisciplinary discussion, and helps ensure that our programming represents the true breadth of diverse perspectives, experiences, and identities of the Sirens community.
The Sirens online proposals system is closed for the 2018 conference. Thank you to everyone who made a proposal! The vetting board will provide decisions by June 11; if you have any questions, please write to (programming at sirensconference.org).